As a new emerging technology for the diagnosis of dental caries, near-infrared imaging requires further research and validation to determine its effectiveness. This study aims to compare near-infrared imaging with cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) to validate the efficiency of near-infrared imaging in diagnosing proximal caries using large-scale clinical data through retrospective cross-sectional studies.
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
positive percent agreement
Timeframe: After the interpretation of CBCT, NIRI, and UVE, an average of 10 months.
negative percent agreement
Timeframe: After the interpretation of CBCT, NIRI, and UVE, an average of 10 months.
overall percent agreement
Timeframe: After the interpretation of CBCT, NIRI, and UVE, an average of 10 months.