Efficacy of Self - Adjustable Clavicular Brace Versus Standard Clavicular Brace for Treatment of … (NCT06276218) | Clinical Trial Compass
UnknownNot Applicable
Efficacy of Self - Adjustable Clavicular Brace Versus Standard Clavicular Brace for Treatment of Mid Shaft Clavicle Fracture: A Randomized Controlled Study
Thailand68 participantsStarted 2022-02-01
Plain-language summary
A randomized control trial was conducted to compare the outcomes of conservative management for closed midshaft clavicular fractures using self-adjustable clavicular brace and standard clavicular brace.
Who can participate
Age range18 Years – 75 Years
SexALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion Criteria:
* Patient with aged between 18 - 75 years old
* Closed isolated fracture midshaft of clavicle within 9 days after the injury date
Exclusion Criteria:
* After bracing, fracture displacement and/or shortening \> 2 cm or fracture comminution \> 3 fragments
* Segmental fracture
* Open fracture
* Impending open fracture (soft tissue compromise/skin lesion)
* Ipsilateral upper extremities fracture which disturbs clavicular bracing
* Floating shoulder which surgical treatment is indicated.
* Patients with other injuries (e.g. head injury, chest and abdomen injury) which interrupted clavicular bracing
* Pathologic fracture
* Patient has limitation for clavicular brace application
* Pregnant women