Individuals with an above-knee lower limb amputation are known to walk more slowly, expend more energy, have a greater risk of falling, and have reduced quality of life compared to individuals without amputation and those with below knee amputation. One of the driving factors behind these deficits is the lack of active function provided by above-knee prostheses with prosthetic knees and ankles. While many prosthetic devices have been developed for functional restoration after major lower extremity amputation, there remains no stable interface to facilitate reliable, long-term volitional control of an advanced robotic limb capable moving multiple joints. Moreover, there is no existing interface that provides useful sensory feedback that in turn enhances the functional capabilities of the prosthesis. To achieve both greater signal specificity and long-term signal stability, we have developed a biologic interface known as the Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface (RPNI). An RPNI consists of a peripheral nerve that is implanted into a free muscle graft that would otherwise go unused in the residual limb. As the nerve grows, it reinnervates the free muscle graft which undergoes a predictable sequence of revascularization and regeneration. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Can the amplitude, movement specificity and stability of sciatic nerve RPNI electromyography (EMG) signals be detected up to one year post RPNI surgery? 2. Do RPNIs contain information to enable control of a physical motorized prosthetic leg with multiple degrees of freedom? 3. Does stimulation of sciatic nerve RPNIs provides meaningful sensory feedback? Consenting participants with unilateral transfemoral amputation (TFA) will: 1. Undergo RPNI surgery and electrode implantation in the residual limb. 2. Attend regular follow-up visits following surgery to assess the health and signal strength of the RPNIs and their ability to use a prescribed prosthesis between 3- and 12-months following implantation. 3. Undergo explantation of electrodes following the conclusion of data collection.
Age range
18 Years – 75 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
Intensity of pain in residual and phantom limbs
Timeframe: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Neuropathic Pain in residual limb
Timeframe: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Health-Related Quality of Life
Timeframe: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Amplitude and signal-to-noise ratio for each RPNI
Timeframe: Postoperatively at each experimental visit at 3,6,9 & 12 months
Classification accuracy for movements of the phantom limb
Timeframe: Postoperatively at each experimental visit at 3,6,9 & 12 months
Threshold for sensation after electrical stimulation of RPNI
Timeframe: Postoperatively at each experimental visit at 3,6,9 & 12 months