MIPO Versus Conventional Approach in Volar Locking Plate for Close Fractures Distal End Radius Un… (NCT06260761) | Clinical Trial Compass
CompletedNot Applicable
MIPO Versus Conventional Approach in Volar Locking Plate for Close Fractures Distal End Radius Under WALANT
Thailand68 participantsStarted 2021-10-05
Plain-language summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis (MIPO) approach with conventional methods in volar locking plate treatment for distal end radius fractures under the Wide Awake Local Anesthesia No Tourniquet (WALANT) technique. The main question it aims to answer is: Does the MIPO approach provide better pain control than the conventional approach of volar locking plate fixation in distal radius fractures under WALANT? Participants will be requested to record their pain on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), assess their functional scores, and undergo postoperative radiographic evaluations. Researchers will compare the MIPO group and the conventional group to determine the postoperative pain VAS scores, shedding light on the comparative effectiveness of the two approaches.
Who can participate
Age range
18 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion Criteria:
* isolated closed fractures of the distal end radius requiring surgery
* aged 18 years and older
Exclusion Criteria:
* Patients with bone fractures lasting more than 21 days
* open fractures
* articular multi-fragmentary comminuted fractures of the distal radius
* not suitable to undergo volar approach surgery
* individuals with combined carpal fractures or dislocation
* ulna fractures
* associated injuries
* a history of previous wrist surgery
* diabetes mellitus
* chronic wrist inflammation
* wrist bone deformities
* the use of anticoagulation drugs
* uncooperative behavior
* those refusing to participate in the research
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
What they're measuring
1
Pain Visual analogue scale
Timeframe: Postoperative day 0-7 and 2,6,10,14,24 weeks