Clinical Risk Scores in Prediction Outcome of Acute UGIT Bleeding in Non Cirrhotic Patients (NCT06254352) | Clinical Trial Compass
UnknownNot Applicable
Clinical Risk Scores in Prediction Outcome of Acute UGIT Bleeding in Non Cirrhotic Patients
100 participantsStarted 2024-03-01
Plain-language summary
To compare the ability of 4 bleeding risk scoring systems (Glasgow -Blatchford score, MAP, H3B2 and ABC scores ) in prediction of: Need of intervention, Re bleeding, Thirty-day mortality, length of hospital stay
Who can participate
Age range
18 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion Criteria:
* Adult non cirrhotic patients
* patients more than 18 years old
* Hematemesis or coffee grounds vomiting.
* Melena with or without hematemesis.
* Blood in nasogastric tube in emergency unit.
Exclusion Criteria:
* Patients younger than 18 years old.
* Patients known to be cirrhotic.
* Patients presented with GIT bleeding but refuse to be examined by GIT endoscopy.
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
What they're measuring
1
correlation between Glasgow -Blatchford score, MAP score.
Timeframe: Baseline
2
correlation between Glasgow -Blatchford score, H3B2 score.
Timeframe: Baseline
3
correlation between Glasgow -Blatchford score, ABC score.