Survival and Success of Two Different Filling Techniques (NCT06252337) | Clinical Trial Compass
Active — Not RecruitingNot Applicable
Survival and Success of Two Different Filling Techniques
Italy80 participantsStarted 2023-01-01
Plain-language summary
This randomized clinical study analysed the clinical use of a new bioceramic premixed CaSi-containing sealer in association with a warm carrier-based technique or a traditional epoxy resin based sealer.
Methodology: Healthy patients requiring root canal treatments were enrolled. Periapical X-rays were taken preoperatively, after root canal filling and after 1, 6, and 12 and 24 months. Two evaluators assessed the Periapical Index (PAI) and the sealer extrusion. The healing rate and survival rate were also evaluated. Barnard test was used to assess the relationship of each potential prognostic factor with periapical index (PAI) at 12-month follow-up. The significance level was set at 0.05.
Who can participate
Age range18 Years – 75 Years
SexALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion criteria
✓. Age 18-75 years
✓. Healthy status (ASA 1 or 2)
✓. At least one tooth affected by endodontic pathology (pulpitis, pulp necrosis, re-exacerbated lesions with a previous root canal treatment) (b)
Exclusion criteria
✕. Teeth with less than 2 walls of crown structural integrity
✕. Teeth used as abutments for fixed rehabilitation
✕. Presence of active periodontal disease (PPD \> 4 mm, general BoP \> 25% of the sites)
✕. Wide apexes (\>40 diameters) or absence of radiographic pulp chamber
✕. Any systemic pathology that could compromise bone healing or the immune response (i.e., diabetes)