The Post-traumatic Extension Contracture of the Knee (PECK) is a common complication following knee traumas. It is characterized by a restricted Range of Motion (ROM), pain, and discomfort in the affected knee. Various factors can cause PECK, primarily inflammation and scar tissue formation. The underlying inflammatory state leads to the development of scar tissue, which - when combined with immobilization - results in the progressive stiffness of the knee. Additionally, prolonged immobilization leads to muscle atrophy and, consequently, reduced mobility and increased rigidity. All these conditions contribute to a limited ROM, making it challenging to perform various daily activities. Sometimes conservative treatments can be effective, but surgery is often necessary to restore joint functionality and alleviate pain. Historically, various surgical approaches have been proposed to address post-traumatic knee stiffness. Open surgery is typically reserved for cases where arthroscopic adhesion release and manipulation under anesthesia have not been successful. Over the last century, various open surgical techniques have been proposed. In particular, arthromyolysis according to Judet was first described in the 1950s by the French orthopedic surgeon Jacques Judet. This technique involves a series of incisions and soft tissue releases, allowing the surgeon to resolve the stiffness of the quadriceps tendon caused by trauma or prolonged immobilization. Although effective in restoring knee joint functionality, arthromyolysis according to Judet is not without risks and potential complications. These include infection, massive bleeding, nerve and muscle-tendon injuries, and residual stiffness. The purpose of this study is to analyze our case series related to arthromyolysis according to Judet for PECK. Clinical outcomes, complications, and patient satisfaction following this type of intervention will be evaluated.
Age range
18 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
Range of Motion at follow-up
Timeframe: baseline time 0