Effect of Different Drilling Techniques on Primary Stability and Marginal Bone Loss of Extra Shor… (NCT06234566) | Clinical Trial Compass
UnknownNot Applicable
Effect of Different Drilling Techniques on Primary Stability and Marginal Bone Loss of Extra Short Implants
30 participantsStarted 2024-03-01
Plain-language summary
Our aim in this study is to compare the effects of low-speed drilling surgery technique without irrigation and conventional implant surgery technique with irrigation on extra short implants. The criteria to be taken into consideration when investigating the effect of these techniques on implants are as follows: evaluation of osseointegration at the end of three months, evaluation of marginal bone loss at the end of three months, initial insertion torque values (maximum insertion torque and final insertion torque), ISQ values obtained with a radiofrequency analyzer (Osstel) at the beginning and at the end of three months.
Who can participate
Age range
18 Years – 60 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion Criteria:
* There must be toothless space in the maxillary and mandibular posterior region (distal part of the canine in each quadrant).
* The edentulous space should not require additional bone grafting.
* Bleeding areas on probing should be less than 10%
* There should be no pathological periodontal pockets
* Patients who do not smoke or smoke less than 10 cigarettes
* There should be no bruxism
* At least 6 months must have passed since the last tooth extracted from the toothless space where the implant is planned.
* There should be no diabetes.
Exclusion Criteria:
* Having psychological problems
* Smoking more than 10 cigarettes
* Alcohol and drug use
* Pregnancy
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
What they're measuring
1
Evaluation of the status of osseointegration
Timeframe: Three months after the implant is placed in the bone. At the end of three months
2
Marginal bone lose
Timeframe: Three months after the implant is placed in the bone. At the end of three months