This observational multicenter study aims to evaluate the reliability and validity of the e-tool for selecting patients eligible for SCS for chronic pain caused by one of the four etiologies listed above in the experience of daily clinical practice. The implantation procedure and devices used will be those used in the routine clinical practice of participating centers. Since the study is observational, the use of the e-tool will not replace the routine medical and psychological evaluation in participating centers before SCS implantation. Study Objectives: Primary Objective: Evaluate the degree of agreement/disagreement between the physicians opinion and the e-tool in selecting patients eligible for spinal cord stimulation for chronic pain. Endpoint: Calculation of the probability of disagreement (Ï€D) between the e-tool and the physicians opinion regarding the appropriateness of the intervention. Secondary Objective: Evaluate the ability of the e-tool to classify interventions defined as appropriate and highly likely to succeed; (scores 7-9) at 3 different time points: trial, 6-month follow-up, and 12-month follow-up. The proportion of interventions that were successful at the trial implantation in different time points will be compared with the proportion of interventions identified as appropriate and highly likely to succeed by the e-tool. Study Period: 24 months. 12 months of enrollment + 12 months of follow-up. Subjects: Number of subjects to be included: at least 60 (total divided between the two centers) Participating Centers: * Pain Therapy Unit - ICSMaugeri, Pavia * Anesthesia and Pain Therapy SD - Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana Pisa
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Numerical rating scale
Timeframe: through study completion, an average of 1 year