The study hypothesis is that the rate of inadequate surgical margins after conservative breast surgery for DICS and the rate of reoperation (re-excision or/and mastectomy) is lower in the group of patients who underwent standard preoperative mammography and CEM to assess the extent of DICS, compared to the group of patients for whom the preoperative assessment of the extent of in situ breast cancer was not performed using one of the imaging techniques with contrast medium such as contrast mammography or magnetic resonance imaging.
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Number of true positive CEMs in the Interventional group
Timeframe: 3 years
Number of false positive CEMs in the Interventional Group
Timeframe: 3 years
Number of true negative CEMs in the Interventional Group
Timeframe: 3 years
Number of false negative CEMs in the Interventional Group
Timeframe: 3 years
True positive rate of CEM vs. MMG (Sensitivity)
Timeframe: 3 years
True negative rate of CEM vs. MMG (Specificity)
Timeframe: 3 years
False positive rate of CEM vs. MMG (overestimation)
Timeframe: 3 years
False negative rate of CEM vs. MMG (underestimation)
Timeframe: 3 years
Accuracy of CEM vs. MMG
Timeframe: 3 years
Inadequate surgical margins rate in the Interventional Group
Timeframe: 3 years
Inadequate surgical margins rate in the Control Group
Timeframe: 3 years
Re-operation rate in the Interventional Group
Timeframe: 3 years
Re-operation rate in the Control Group
Timeframe: 3 years
Mastectomy rate in the Interventional Group
Timeframe: 3 years
Mastectomy rate in the Control Group
Timeframe: 3 years