Effect of Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube Feeding vs. Nasogastric Tube Feeding on Dysphagia Pati… (NCT06211777) | Clinical Trial Compass
WithdrawnNot Applicable
Effect of Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube Feeding vs. Nasogastric Tube Feeding on Dysphagia Patients After Stroke
Stopped: ethical issues
China0Started 2024-01-10
Plain-language summary
This was a prospective multicenter study. the patients after stroke with were randomly divided into the observation group and the control group. All patients were given comprehensive rehabilitation therapy. During the treatment, enteral nutrition support was provided for the two groups by Intermittent Oro-esophageal tube feeding and nasogastric tube feeding, respectively. Nutritional status, dysphagia, quality of life and depression before and after treatment were compared.
Who can participate
Age range
18 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion Criteria:
* age ≥ 18 years;
* meeting the diagnostic criteria of stroke;
* any degree of dysphagia at admission;
* steady vital signs, without severe cognitive impairment or sensory aphasia, able to cooperate with the assessment.
* transferred out within three weeks of hospitalization in the neurology department.
Exclusion Criteria:
* complicated with other neurological diseases;
* damaged mucosa or incomplete structure in nasopharynx;
* tracheostomy tube plugged;
* unfeasible to the support of parenteral nutrition;
* simultaneously suffering from liver, kidney failure, tumors, or hematological diseases.
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.