Compared Unidirectional Valve Apparatus and Occluding the Non-ventilated Endobronchial Lumen for … (NCT06210256) | Clinical Trial Compass
UnknownNot Applicable
Compared Unidirectional Valve Apparatus and Occluding the Non-ventilated Endobronchial Lumen for Lung Collapse.
China192 participantsStarted 2024-01-25
Plain-language summary
With the rapid advancement of thoracoscopic surgery in recent years, surgeons have set higher standards for the quality of non-ventilated lung collapse. In a prior investigation, we examined a unidirectional valve device that let air exit the non-ventilated side of the lung but not enter during ventilation and showed the use of this device during one-lung ventilation (OLV) for patients undergoing thoracoscopic surgery could speed up lung collapse, lower endogenous positive end-expiratory pressure, and have no discernible effects on oxygenation. In light of this, we conducted this study to further demonstrate, by comparison with the commonly used clinical technique of occluding the non-ventilated endobronchial lumen during one-lung ventilation, that this unidirectional valve device can quicken and enhance the quality of lung collapse without raising the risk of adverse events when used in thoracoscopic surgery.
Who can participate
Age range
18 Years – 75 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Exclusion criteria
. anticipated difficult intubation
. New York Heart Association (NYHA) heart failure class III/IV
. body mass index≥35kg/m2
. patients with abnormal expiratory recoil \[forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV1) less than 70% of predicted values
. chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or severe asthma
. prior thoracic surgery or radiotherapy
. a history of pleural or interstitial disease
. the discovery of pleural adhesions following pleural opening
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.