WithdrawnNot Applicable

Effect of Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube vs. Nasogastric Tube on Feeding Amount in Stroke Patients

Stopped: ethical issues

China0Started 2024-01-20

Plain-language summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the differences in feeding amount and nutritional status between ischemic stroke patients using Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube and Nasogastric Tube. Patients will be randomly divided into an observation group and a control group, all receiving routine rehabilitation treatment. On this basis, the observation group will use Intermittent Oro esophageal Tube for enteral nutrition support, while the control group will use Nasogastric Tube. Researchers will compare changes in daily intake and nutritional status of two groups of patients before and after the study to see if Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube can improve the feeding amount and nutritional status between ischemic stroke patients compared to Nasogastric Tube

Who can participate

Age range18 Years

SexALL

See this in plain English?

AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.

Inclusion Criteria: * Age\>18 years. * Meeting the diagnostic criteria for ischemic stroke . * Dysphagia confirmed by Videofluoroscopic Swallowing Study. * Clear consciousness. * No history of prior stroke. * Stable vital signs. Exclusion Criteria: * Dysphagia that might be caused by other diseases that might cause dysphagia, such as head and neck tumors, traumatic brain injury, myasthenia gravis, etc. * Complicated with severe liver and kidney failure, tumors, or hematological disorders. * Simultaneously in need to undergo other therapy that might affect the outcomes of this study. * Pregnant or nursing females.

What they're measuring

Feeding Amount

Timeframe: day 1 and day 15

Trial details

NCT IDNCT06202807

SponsorZeng Changhao

Sponsor typeOTHER

Study typeINTERVENTIONAL

Primary completion2024-04-01