Treatment Outcomes of Pulpotomy vs. Pulpectomy in Vital Primary Molars With Symptomatic Irreversi… (NCT06183203) | Clinical Trial Compass
WithdrawnNot Applicable
Treatment Outcomes of Pulpotomy vs. Pulpectomy in Vital Primary Molars With Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis
Stopped: Trials sites withdrew from the study as patient recruitment was not possible
India0Started 2024-02-15
Plain-language summary
This randomised controlled trial aims to compare treatment outcomes between pulpotomy and pulpectomy when used to treat vital primary molars diagnosed with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis. Compared to the standard pulpectomy treatment, pulpotomy is a technically simpler procedure, less time consuming, easier for young patients to tolerate, while retaining the proprioceptive sensation of the tooth - all important advantages when treating young children.
Who can participate
Age range
4 Years – 9 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion criteria
. Healthy (ASA I and II) co-operative children (Frankl Scale + and ++) between the ages of four and nine years.
. Participants have symptoms typical of irreversible pulpitis in one of the primary molars.
. The pulp of the affected primary molar is vital.
. Radicular pulp health is confirmed by attainment of radicular pulp haemostasis within 8 minutes of coronal pulp amputation.
. The affected primary molars can be restored with full coverage crowns.
. Any physiologic root resorption, if present, is less than ⅓ the root length
Exclusion criteria
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.