Action Observation and Motor Imagery Therapy in Stroke (NCT06166862) | Clinical Trial Compass
RecruitingNot Applicable
Action Observation and Motor Imagery Therapy in Stroke
Turkey (Türkiye)56 participantsStarted 2023-12-12
Plain-language summary
In recent years, motor imagery (MI) and action observation (AO) therapy strategies have been used in rehabilitation programs to increase motor learning in stroke. Visuomotor training strategies such as AO and MI therapy rely on the activity of the mirror neuron system to facilitate motor re-learning. Mirror neurons are activated during the performance of goal-directed actions, also when observing the same action and visualizing the action in the mind.
This clinical trial aims to test whether the application of AO and MI treatment in stroke in addition to conventional rehabilitation programs has an additional effect on motor recovery, activities of daily living, and quality of life.
Who can participate
Age range
18 Years – 65 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion Criteria:
* Patients who had a stroke in the last year
* Functional Ambulation Classification score 2-5
Exclusion Criteria:
* Patients who have had repeated strokes
* Patients with neglect
* Patients with cognitive dysfunction (those who cannot follow simple verbal instructions)
* Patients with severe hearing problems
* Patients with severe vision problems
* Patients with additional musculoskeletal system pathology that will affect physical performance (such as amputation, severe joint mobility limitation, peripheral nerve damage)
* Patients with uncontrolled hypertension and diabetes mellitus
* Patients with a history of symptomatic lung disease (such as asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, emphysema)
* Patients with a history of symptomatic cardiac disease (such as coronary artery disease, arrhythmia, heart failure)
* Patients with peripheral artery disease
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
What they're measuring
1
The difference in the scores of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment between pre- and post-rehabilitation assessments
Timeframe: 6 weeks
2
The difference in the scores of the Brunnstrom stages between pre- and post-rehabilitation assessments