UnknownNot Applicable

Laparoscopic Versus Open Pyeloplasty for Treatment of UPJO in Children.

40 participantsStarted 2024-01-01

Plain-language summary

Uretropelvic junction ( UPJ ) obstruction is a common congenital disorder , but not all cases require surgical intervention. Uretropelvic junction ( UPJ ) obstruction is a common congenital disorder , but not all cases require surgical intervention. On the other hand, in children many authors reported mini incision open pyeloplasty with very small subcostal muscle splitting incision, with negligible postoperative pain and very short hospital stay

Who can participate

Age range1 Year – 18 Years

SexALL

See this in plain English?

AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.

Inclusion Criteria: * Children between 1-18 years , males and females with UPJ obstruction in orthotopic kidney indicated for dismembered pyeloplasty and not else Exclusion Criteria: * Recurrent UPJ obstruction. * Cases that require technique other than dismembered pyeloplasty * Patients that have contradiction to laparoscopy. * comorbidities that prevent surgery e.g: uncorrected coagulopathy and vertebro-spinal deformity * patient refusing participation in the study.

What they're measuring

Operative time

Timeframe: baseline

Trial details

NCT IDNCT06142734

SponsorAhmed Mahmoud Abdelraouf

Sponsor typeOTHER

Study typeINTERVENTIONAL

Primary completion2026-01-01

View on ClinicalTrials.gov More Pyeloplasty trials