The purpose of this study is to characterize safety and to determine the recommended phase 2 regimen (RP2R) for JNJ-87801493 in combination with T-cell engagers (TCEs) \[Part A: Dose Escalation\] and to further assess the safety of JNJ-87801493 at the RP2R in combination with TCEs \[Part B: Dose Expansion\].
Who can participate
Age range
18 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion Criteria:
* Histologic documentation of B-cell NHL. All participants in part 1 must have relapsed or refractory disease with no other approved therapies available that would be more appropriate in the investigator's judgment. In Part 2, participants with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) or other high-grade B cell lymphoma and participants with transformed lymphoma from low-grade B cell malignancies who relapsed or failed to respond to only one prior systemic treatment regimen can be included
* Part 1 participants must have evaluable or measurable disease and Part 2 participants must have measurable disease; all as defined by the Lugano criteria for non-Hodgkin lymphoid malignancies (NHL) and the international workshop on Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia (IWWM-6) for WM
* Have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 to 2
* Hematologic laboratory parameters must meet the required criterias and the values must be without a transfusion or growth factors for at least 7 days prior to the first dose of study drug
* Participants of childbearing potential must have a negative highly sensitive serum pregnancy test (beta (β)-human chorionic gonadotropin) at screening and within 72 hours of the first dose of study treatment and must agree to further serum or urine pregnancy tests during the study.
Exclusion Criteria:
* Known active central nervous system involvement (CNS) or leptomeningeal involvement. CNS involvement may be allowed in specif…
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
What they're measuring
1
Part 1: Number of Participants with Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLTs)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years 7 months
2
Part 1 and 2: Percentage of Participants with Adverse Events (AEs) by Severity