Endocarditis are deadly infections, which nowadays occurs mainly among older patients with multiple comorbidities. The incidence is notably high among patients with valvular prosthetic or implantable devices. Management of such situation usually requires intravenous antibiotic therapy along with removal of the infected prosthetic or device. However, such invasive procedures and revision surgeries may be judged unreasonable among these patients, who are then exposed to a high risk of infectious relapse when curative antibiotics are discontinued. In these situation, a long-course antibiotic therapy may be used in order to maintain lasting infection control, to limit the risks of relapse of infection due to the infected device retention, and ultimately to prolong survival. This strategy is already suggested in case of infected prosthesis joint retention (IDSA 2013), and has been proposed for implantable device retention by the American Heart Rhythm Society in 2017, but data regarding its modalities and outcomes are scare. The objectives of this study are to describe the survival of patient under long-term antibiotic therapy for endocarditis, at 6-months and 1 year after initiation. Secondary outcomes includes modalities of the suppressive treatment prescribed, its security (secondary effects, tolerance) and to precise causes of death.
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Survival of the patient who benefited from suppressive antibiotic therapy
Timeframe: Survival at 6 months, 1 year, 3 years after infection