Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Regorafenib in Specific GIST Mutation Subsets (KIT Exon… (NCT06087263) | Clinical Trial Compass
Active — Not RecruitingPhase 2
Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Regorafenib in Specific GIST Mutation Subsets (KIT Exon 17, 18, or 14 Mutation and SDHB Deficient GIST) in the Post-imatinib Second-line Setting.
United States3 participantsStarted 2024-06-18
Plain-language summary
To learn if regorafenib can help to control the disease.
Who can participate
Age range
18 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients must have measurable disease, defined as at least one lesion that can be accurately measured in at least one dimension (longest diameter to be recorded for nonnodal lesions and short axis for nodal lesions) as≥10 mm (≥1 cm) with CT scan, MRI, or calipers by clinical exam.
* Age ≥18 years.
* Histologic diagnosis of GIST with presence of KIT exon 17, 18, or 14 mutation, or SDHB deficiency on tumor biopsy and/ or liquid biopsy.
* Participants must have unresectable or metastatic GIST and radiologic progression on imatinib treatment. Imatinib treatment must have been discontinued at least 5 days prior to the first dose of study drug. All imatinib treatment will be counted as 1 line of therapy.
* ECOG performance status ≤2 (Karnofsky ≥60%) at screening.
* Life expectancy of at least 12 weeks (3 months).
* Subjects must be able to understand and be willing to sign the written informed consent form. A signed informed consent form must be appropriately obtained prior to the conduct of any trialspecific procedure.
* Patients must have adequate organ and marrow function as definedbelow:
Hemoglobin ≥8 g/dL Absolute neutrophil count ≥1,000/mcL Platelets ≥100,000/mcL Total bilirubin ≤2 x institutional upper limit of normal (ULN) or \<3 x ULN in the presence of Gilbert's Disease AST and ALT ≤3 × institutional ULN ALT and AST ≤ 2.5 x ULN (≤ 5 x ULN for subjects with liver involvement of their cancer) Alkaline phosphatase ≤ 2.5 x ULN (≤ 5 x ULN for subjects wi…
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
What they're measuring
1
Incidence of Adverse Events, Graded According to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) Version (v) 5.0
Timeframe: through study completion; an average of 1 year