The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to compare the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA) with sham surgery for patients suffering from unilateral cancer-related lymphedema in either the upper or lower extremity. It aims to answer whether LVA is more effective than sham surgery in terms of improvement in Lymph-ICF score. A total of 110 participants will be allocated randomly into two groups at a 1:1 ratio. The first group will receive lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA), while the second group will undergo sham surgery.
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Change from baseline in the Lymph-ICF Score at 12 and 24 months
Timeframe: Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months post-operatively and afterwards annually during the extended follow-up, lasting up to the start of the first analysis (maximally 3 years extra or 3 additional visits).
Tanya Wolffenbuttel, MSc