Stopped: After discussing this study with the investigators, it was decided to consider it a retrospective study rather than a clinical trial. Since we could not delete this record, we chose the termination status instead.
The goal of this interventional study is to compare the effect of Concurrent cystocele repair and trans obturator tape (TOT) and TOT alone in a sample of Iraqi Female participants with diagnosed stress urinary incontinence and cystocele. The main questions to answer are: 1-What are the effects of the tested Interventions on the outcomes measured by The Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) System? 1. What are the effects of the tested Interventions on the degree of pelvic organ prolapse? 2. What are the effects of the tested Interventions on the frequency, severity, and effect of Stress urinary incontinence on the quality of life of the patients? 3. What are the effects of the tested Interventions on the impact of lower urinary tract symptoms on the quality of the patient's life? Female Patients diagnosed with SUI indicated for intervention were divided into 2 groups Group I: (n=49) offered TOT alone Group II: (n=49) offered concurrent TOT and Cystocele Repair Patients were then followed up and evaluated using The Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) System, The International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-SF), and the King Health Questionnaire (KHQ). The efficacy of both procedures and their impact on SUI and quality of life was measured.
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Degree of Pelvic organ Prolapse (POP-Q)
Timeframe: At baseline, and at 9 months
Frequency, severity, and effect of urine incontinence on quality of life.
Timeframe: At baseline, and at 9 months