The increased use of diagnostic imaging and especially computed tomography pulmonary angiography in patients suspected of pulmonary embolism (PE) is an important point of concerns.
The goal of this pragmatic cluster-randomized trial is to compare the diagnostic strategy based on the four-level pulmonary embolism probability score (4PEPS) and current practices.
The main questions it aims to answer is: "Does the diagnostic strategy based on 4PEPS significantly reduce the use of thoracic imaging without increasing the risk of serious adverse events as compared to current diagnostic practices?" Patients suspected of having PE in the participating emergency departments will be included and followed for 90 days. In ten centers, the emergency physicians will apply the 4PEPS strategy and in ten other centers, the emergency physicians will be free to do as they see fit. Researchers will compare the two groups of patients to see if the rate of diagnostic thoracic imaging tests and the rate of adverse events related to diagnostic strategies will differ.
Who can participate
Age range
18 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion Criteria:
* Admission to an emergency department participating in the study.
* Suspected PE due to thoracic symptoms (dyspnea, chest pain, or hemoptysis) and/or syncope without any other obvious explanation after clinical examination and possible additional first-line tests (ECG, chest X-ray, or routine lab work-up).
Exclusion Criteria:
* Age \< 18 years.
* Known result of a specific diagnostic imaging examination for PE (thoracic CT angiography, pulmonary scintigraphy, or venous ultrasound of the lower limbs).
* Hemodynamic instability (systolic blood pressure \< 90 mmHg or more than 40 mmHg lower than usual for more than 15 min).
* Curative dose of anticoagulant in place for more than two days prior to inclusion.
* Pregnant or parturient patient.
* Patient in detention by judicial or administrative decision.
* Patient undergoing compulsory psychiatric treatment.
* Patient placed under a legal protection measure.
* Patient who objects to participating in the research (preliminary phase) or is unable to give free and informed consent (active phase).
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
What they're measuring
1
Rate of serious clinical events in the 90 days following inclusion