Health-Economic Evaluation of Early Diagnosis of Epithalial Ovarian Cancer Recurrence Using the R… (NCT05991752) | Clinical Trial Compass
WithdrawnNot Applicable
Health-Economic Evaluation of Early Diagnosis of Epithalial Ovarian Cancer Recurrence Using the ROMA Score: a Prospective Multicenter Randomized Trial
Stopped: feasibility issue
0Started 2025-05-31
Plain-language summary
In this study, we hypothesize that calculating the ROMA score (CA125 + HE4 blood marker assay) will enable faster, more targeted diagnosis and management of epithelial ovarian cancer recurrence than the CA125 marker assay alone. This early identification of recurrence would then improve patients' quality of life, since it would increase the chances of benefiting from less invasive and less morbid surgery. It would also reduce the cost of patient management following disease progression. If our hypothesis is confirmed, the results of this study will enable us to update the recommendations for post-treatment follow-up of patients in remission from epithelial ovarian cancer, as well as reimbursing the HE4 marker assay (and thus the calculation of the ROMA score).
Who can participate
Age range
18 Years – 85 Years
Sex
FEMALE
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion Criteria:
* Women aged 18 or over and less than 85 years old
* With proven FIGO stage I to IV epithelial ovarian cancer (ovary/tumor/peritoneum)
* Women in remission after first-line chemotherapy, with a normal CA125 less than 4 months old at study entry (end of first-line chemotherapy).
* Woman having completed chemotherapy at least 6 months previously
* Written informed consent
* French social security
Exclusion Criteria:
* Any physical or psychiatric condition that may interfere with the patient's cooperation in data collection
* Patient with normal CA125 at initial diagnosis of epithelial ovarian cancer
* Patient under guardianship
* Patient deprived of liberty
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
What they're measuring
1
Incremental Cost-Utility Ratio (ICUR) expressed as the cost per QALY gained at 36 months of using the ROMA score compared to usual follow-up with the CA-125 test, from the collective perspective.