Comparison Between ROLL Versus Magnetic Seed for Preoperative Localization of Non-palpable Breast… (NCT05942118) | Clinical Trial Compass
Active — Not RecruitingNot Applicable
Comparison Between ROLL Versus Magnetic Seed for Preoperative Localization of Non-palpable Breast Lesion by Randomized Clinical Study.
Italy262 participantsStarted 2023-05-31
Plain-language summary
Several localization techniques are now in use for localization of non-palpable breast lesions. Several studies have compared wire guided localization (WGL), which has been for years the gold standard for non-palpable breast lesions' localization, with more modern techniques. Scientific evidence supports the efficacy of the new "wire-free" techniques, which appear to be comparable to the WGL in terms of safe surgical resection, while overcoming limitations associated with logistic difficulties and patient discomfort. There is still limited data in literature on the comparative effectiveness of these modern techniques, and there is no strong evidence that one is superior to the others. In particular, no randomized trials of comparison between ROLL and magnetic seed localization are currently available. The aim of this randomized study is to compare ROLL with magnetic seed to assess their efficacy for non-palpable breast lesions' localization.
Who can participate
Age range
18 Years – 85 Years
Sex
FEMALE
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion Criteria:
* Female;
* Non-palpable breast lesions;
* Indication to lesion's surgical excision (lumpectomy, quadrantectomy)
* Preoperative diagnosis on histology or cytology of borderline lesion (B3 or C3) or malignant lesion (B4-B5 or C4-C5);
* Written informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
* Benign lesion at diagnosis on preoperative core biopsy (B2) or fine needle aspiration (C2);
* Clinically palpable breast lesion;
* Breast lesion localization for planned neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.