Heart failure is the most common cause of admission to hospital and is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Treatment options consist of medical- and device treatment and self-care strategies, where fluid restriction has been one of the components in the self-care management of patients with chronic heart failure. The medical treatment has progressed and improved over the years and considerably over the last few years, which has decreased symptoms and improved physical function of these patients. Despite our great success in the medical treatment of heart failure, we still face challenges in hospital readmissions and treatment strategies. It contributes to the increased need of evidence on, if and how, fluid intake and fluid restriction should be used as a self-care method. Fluid restriction as a self-care treatment is still commonly recommended in heart failure management although the scientific clinical evidence is lacking. Fluid restriction is associated with a higher degree of thirst and lower rated quality of life, and there is no consensus on how fluid restriction should be used, no plan for individualized treatment and no agreement on how fluid restriction should be a part of the patient self-care treatment. There is therefore a need for knowledge on how heart failure patients are affected by fluid restriction regarding clincal signs and symptoms of heart failure, quality of life, physical function, readmission to hospital or heart failure events. The primary aim of the study is to investigate whether a free fluid intake is safe compared to a restricted fluid intake, regarding clinical signs of heart failure measured as the presence of B-lines and/or an increase in NT-proBNP. The secondary aim is to clarify whether an unlimited fluid intake can improve quality of life and reduce thirst without affecting heart failure symptoms, physical activity, hospital readmissions and/or heart failure events.
Age range
18 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
B-lines
Timeframe: 12 weeks
NT-proBNP
Timeframe: 12 weeks