A Comparison of Morbidity Between Patients With Pulmonary Atresia With Intact Ventricular Septum … (NCT05928234) | Clinical Trial Compass
RecruitingNot Applicable
A Comparison of Morbidity Between Patients With Pulmonary Atresia With Intact Ventricular Septum and Uni- or Biventricular Circulation
Sweden140 participantsStarted 2024-07-15
Plain-language summary
The goal of this observational study is to compare patients with pulmonary atresia with intact ventricular septum (PA-IVS) with univentricular circulation to patients with the same heart defect but that has a biventricular circulation in regards to mortality, quality of life, comorbidity, cardiac function, and work capacity. The main questions the study aims to answer are:
• Do mortality, quality of life, comorbidity, cardiac function, and work capacity differ between patients with PA-IVS who have univentricular and biventricular circulation?
Participants will be asked to answer a Quality of Life questionnaire. The investigators will also inquire with a sample size of the research subjects (based on place of residence) about their participation in a series of examinations (ergo-spirometry to assess work capacity, transthoracic echocardiogram, magnetic resonance of the heart and blood sampling to assess cardiac function and cardiac health).
Who can participate
Age range
15 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion Criteria:
* Individuals born with pulmonary atresia with intact ventricular septum (PA-IVS) who are 15 years or older at the start of the study.
* Regarding the mortality variable, research subjects who have died after the age of 15 years old will be included.
Exclusion Criteria:
Individuals born with pulmonary atresia with intact ventricular septum who are younger than 15 years old at the start of the study.
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.