CompletedNot Applicable

Conventional Impressions Versus Digital Impression Techniques for Implant Supported Screw Retained Prosthesis

Egypt8 participantsStarted 2020-04-30

Plain-language summary

The purpose was to evaluate the accuracy of traditional and digital implant level impression procedures by using three-dimensional superimposition analysis , and evaluate the passive fit of screw- retained implant supported restorations fabricated using conventional and digital impression techniques in bilateral distal extension cases (class I kennedy classification)

Who can participate

Age range

30 Years – 55 Years

Sex

ALL

See this in plain English?

AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.

Inclusion Criteria: * All participants have sufficient bone length and width for implant insertion. * General health of the patients was evaluated by taking a full medical history to ensure that these patients were free from any systemic conditions that would have impaired implant osseointegration * Good oral hygiene * Sufficient inter-arch spaces * The opposing arch was almost dentulous, and any missing teeth were restored using a fixed partial denture. Exclusion Criteria: * parafunctional habits * Heavy smoking * Those patients with systemic diseases that may influence soft or hard tissue healing. * Patients with a history of radiation therapy in the head and neck region. * Patients with a history of radiation therapy in the head and neck region.

Questions worth asking your doctor

Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.

1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?

Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.

Questions for the trial coordinator

The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.

1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?

A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.

What they're measuring

Accuracy of digital and conventional implant impression techniques in partially edentulous patient

Timeframe: 12 months

Trial details

NCT IDNCT05912725

SponsorTanta University

Sponsor typeOTHER

Study typeINTERVENTIONAL

Primary completion2021-12-28

View on ClinicalTrials.gov More Partial Edentulism Class 1 trials