RecruitingNot Applicable

The Cost-effectiveness of Hysterosalpingography Versus Hysterosalpingo-foam Sonography During Fertility Work-up

Netherlands1,102 participantsStarted 2023-09-22

Plain-language summary

Hysterosalpingography (HSG) and hysterosalpingo-foam sonography are two methods to assess tubal patency during fertility work-up. This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of tubal flushing with oil-based contrast during HSG compared to tubal flushing during HyFoSy in women undergoing fertility work-up. The hypothesis is that tubal flushing with oil-based contrast during HSG leads to more live births than tubal flushing during HyFoSy.

Who can participate

Age range18 Years – 42 Years

SexFEMALE

See this in plain English?

AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.

Inclusion Criteria: * Infertile women or women with oligo-or anovulation * Indication for tubal patency testing during the fertility work-up * Sufficient understanding of the Dutch or English language * Signed informed consent Exclusion Criteria: * Severe male factor with a total motile sperm count \<3x106ml (pre-washed) * Known contrast (iodine) allergy * Women who have had a gynecologic procedure within the last 30 days * Women with known or suspected reproductive tract neoplasia

What they're measuring

Number of pregnancies leading to live birth.

Timeframe: within six months after randomization

Trial details

NCT IDNCT05882188

SponsorAmsterdam UMC, location VUmc

Sponsor typeOTHER

Study typeINTERVENTIONAL

Primary completion2026-12-01

Contact for this trial

Danah Kamphuis, Msc

+312044444567 FOil@amsterdamumc.nl

View on ClinicalTrials.gov More Infertility trials