RecruitingPhase 4

Stroke Rate in Patients With Blunt Cerebrovascular Injury (BCVI) Treated With Oral Acetylsalicylic Acid (ASA) 81 mg Versus ASA 325 mg (BASA).

United States98 participantsStarted 2023-08-23

Plain-language summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare difference between Aspirin 81 mg and Aspirin 325 mg in preventing strokes in patients with head and neck vessels injury. The main questions it aims to answer are: * If Aspirin 81 mg efficacy in prevention of stroke in patients with head and neck vessels injury is not lower than and Aspirin 325 mg. * If rate of hemorrhagic complications in patients with head and neck vessels injury taking Aspirin 81 mg is not higher than patients that take Aspirin 325 mg.

Who can participate

Age range

18 Years

Sex

ALL

See this in plain English?

AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.

Inclusion Criteria: * Age ≥18 * All patients with blunt cerebrovascular injury are diagnosed by computed tomography angiography (CTA) upon admission Exclusion Criteria: * Age \<18 * Pregnant women * No enteral route access for Aspirin administration * Patients who are on Heparin drip or other full dose anticoagulation when BCVI diagnosed * Patients who are on other Anti-Platelets aside from Aspirin when BCVI diagnosed * Patients with BCVI grade 5 injury based on Biffl classification * Presence of any contraindication or history of allergy to Aspirin * Patient with the diagnosis of acute stroke at the time of BCVI diagnosis matching the injured vessel territory on imaging * Patients with acute spinal trauma that needs surgical intervention

Questions worth asking your doctor

Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.

1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?

Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.

Questions for the trial coordinator

The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.

1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?

A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.

What they're measuring

Number of patients with new stroke event (ischemic stroke or hemorrhagic stroke)

Timeframe: From randomization up to 3 months after discharge

Trial details

NCT IDNCT05868525

SponsorLoma Linda University

Sponsor typeOTHER

Study typeINTERVENTIONAL

Primary completion2026-12

Contact for this trial

Maryam B Tabrizi, M.D

(909) 558-4286 MTabrizi@llu.edu

View on ClinicalTrials.gov More Blunt Cerebrovascular Injury trials