This study aims to compare the accuracy of evaluating diabetic retinopathy using ultra-widefield fundus images versus two-field fundus images. The hypothesis is that screening and grading diabetic retinopathy based on ultra-widefield fundus images may yield higher accuracy compared to the use of two-field fundus images.
Age range
18 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
The International Clinical Diabetic Retinopathy Disease Severity Scale within the 2-fields fundus photography and Ultra-Wide field scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (Optomap) imaging and statistical comparison
Timeframe: 60 days