In recent decades, different tests have been recommended by guidelines in the management of first febrile urinary tract infection (fUTI) in children, including kidney ultrasound (KUS), cystography (VCUG) and renal scintigraphy in order to exclude underlying kidney anomalies. The majority of guidelines, continue to recommend a routine KUS for all children at the first fUTI. On the other hand, as this approach is not based on robust evidence, other guidelines suggest that KUS should only be performed on selected patients according to specific risks. Despite being a non-invasive and radiation-free method, KUS tests negative in 83% of cases of fUTIs and possesses low specificity for low grade vesico-ureteral reflux (VUR). Since VUR is the most commonly associated renal malformation with UTI, it is evident that all the guidelines focus on the research of VUR, especially in times when antenatal ultrasound allows to screen for major congenital anomalies of kidney and urinary tract (CAKUT). However, VUR-associated nephropathy appears to be related to primary dysplastic damage rather than to be secondary to the reflux itself and not preventable from antibiotic prophylaxis in terms of recurrence and of kidney scar. To reduce the number of normal VCUGs performed, recent evidence regarding VUR suggests that the presence of pathogens different from E. coli and UTI recurrence may help to identify children who necessitate further investigations. A preliminary retrospective monocentric study enrolling all patients aged 2 to 36 months diagnosed with first fUTI who subsequently underwent US evaluation of the kidneys and urinary tract, found that atypical germ and recurrence of UTI exhibits a 85% sensitivity to detect pathological ultrasound. The aim of this multicentric study is to prospectively evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the presence of atypical germ combined with the recurrence of UTI in predicting the positivity of KUS in children aged 2 months to 3 years old with first episode of fUTI
Age range
2 Months – 3 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the presence of an atypical germ combined with the possible recurrence of UTI in predicting the positivity of KUS in children aged between 2 months and 3 years with first episode of fUTI
Timeframe: Follow up of 2 years or until the third year of age