Stopped: It got a great score and it looked like it would be funded, but it was never funded.
People with HIV (PWH) often suffer from cognitive impairments known as HIV-Associated Neurocognitive Disorder (HAND). Cognitive impairments in PWH are not fully captured by traditional neurocognitive assessment; thus, we must examine cognitive performance both within a task (inconsistency) and across cognitive domains (dispersion), called Intra-Individual Variability (IIV). IIV predicts cognitive impairment/decline, altered brain morphology, and neuropathology in many clinical populations. Conceptually, IIV results from "executive dyscontrol" or the efficiency (or inefficiency) with which executive control processes coordinate other cognitive processes/domains. Based on the Executive Dyscontrol Hypothesis and underlying calculations of IIV, one way to improve cognition in PWH is through interventions that target improvements in their most severely impaired cognitive domains. We hypothesize such improvements, in turn, should reduce the strain placed on executive functioning resources, freeing up resources needed to compensate for impairments in any domain and, in turn, reducing IIV. Computerized cognitive training, widely used in the study team's prior work, is ideally suited to target impairments in select cognitive domains using computerized cognitive training. In our systematic review of 13 cognitive training studies in PWH, we found cognitive training improved performance in the targeted domain. In this feasibility study, we will assess 150 PWH at baseline with the expectation to recruit 120 PWH with HAND. Then we will use a two-group pre-post experimental design of 120 adults with HAND including: 1) a Targeted Neurocognitive Training (TNT) group (n=60) to train each participant's two most impaired cognitive domains (e.g., attention \& memory) assessed from a neurocognitive battery at baseline, and 2) a no-contact control group (n=60). Aim 1 - Feasibility: To determine feasibility and acceptability of the intervention. Exploratory Aim 1 - Cognition: Compare adults who receive TNT to those who receive no training to determine whether they improve on the cognitive domains trained, show less cognitive IIV across domains and within a task, and demonstrate improved executive functioning. Exploratory Hypothesis 1: TNT will improve cognitive functioning in the targeted impaired cognitive domains. Exploratory Hypothesis 2: TNT will reduce cognitive IIV (both overall dispersion \& inconsistency). Exploratory Hypothesis 3: TNT will improve executive functioning. Exploratory Hypothesis 4: TNT will improve global cognition and reduce HAND severity. Innovation 1 - This is the first study to use IIV to guide cognitive training to target the most impaired cognitive domains to reduce cognitive IIV in HIV. Innovation 2 - This will be one of the first studies to prospectively include both types of cognitive IIV - dispersion and inconsistency - allowing us to examine the relationship between dispersion and inconsistency. Innovation 3 - The epicenter of HIV is in the Deep South where this study will occur.
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Baseline Assessment of Cognitive Training
Timeframe: ~12 weeks
Cognitive Training Satisfaction Questionnaire
Timeframe: ~12 weeks
Exit Survey
Timeframe: ~12 weeks
Adherence Rates (after study data collection)
Timeframe: Through study completion, an average of 2 years
Attrition Rates (after study data collection)
Timeframe: Through study completion, an average of 2 years