The aim of this observational study is to define speech alterations in the diagnosis of AD-related minor neurocognitive disorder (m-NBB) and major neurocognitive disorder (M-NBB). It is the development of a speech analysis method that can be used in future studies or routine clinical evaluations in these patients by using artificial intelligence and speech recognition methods that are planned to be developed based on the findings obtained. Purposes of the research 1. To define language disorders in the diagnosis of AD-related minor neurocognitive disorder (m-NBB) and major neurocognitive disorder (M-NBB). 2. Developing a speech analysis method that can be used in the early diagnosis of neurocognitive disorder patients by using artificial intelligence and speech recognition methods, which are planned to be developed based on the findings. 3. Evaluation of whether speech analysis distinguishes patients with m-NBB and M-NBB due to AD 4. Evaluation of whether speech analysis distinguishes minor NBD patients from healthy elderly patients. Standardized Mini-Mental Test, Clock Drawing Test, Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale, Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test, Verbal Fluency Test, Enhanced Cued Recall Test, Functional Activities Questionnaire, Trail Making Test, and Hamilton Depression Scale to evaluate the severity of depressive symptoms will be administered to the participants to assess cognitive functions. . In order to evaluate speech the Cookie Theft Picture Description Test, which is a part of the Boston Aphasia Test, will be administered to the participants.
Age range
60 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
Reaching the sufficient number of participants (120 patients and 60 healthy controls, 180 volunteers in total) and comparing the speech/language functions of the two patient groups with the healthy control group
Timeframe: about a year