The following clinical trial investigates the efficacy of transvaginal radiofrequency in the physiotherapy treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI). The treatment compares transvaginal radiofrequency with pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) and PFMT alone. The present study is a randomized controlled trial with double blinding (evaluator and patients). The objective is to evaluate what radiofrequency can provide in the improving of the quality of life, symptoms and pelvic floor muscle strength of patients with SUI. The reason for the combination with PFMT, is that it is the golden standard treatment in pelvic floor rehabilitation and SUI improvement.
Age range
20 Years – 75 Years
Sex
FEMALE
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
Changes in the ICIQ-SF scale before, after and six months after treatment in both groups.
Timeframe: Before treatment, six weeks of treatment, and 6 months assessments were required.
The change of signs, symptoms and impact of pelvic floor dysfunction (PFDI-20) between reviews (before, after and at six months of treatment in both groups).
Timeframe: Before treatment, six weeks of treatment, and 6 months assessments were required.
The change of signs, symptoms and impact of pelvic floor dysfunction (PFIQ-7) between reviews (before, after and at six months of treatment in both groups)
Timeframe: Before treatment, six weeks of treatment, and 6 months assessments were required.