CompletedNot Applicable

Randomized Comparison of Radiation Exposure to Operators in Coronary Intervention Between Right Radial and Left DRA

South Korea1,010 participantsStarted 2023-01-05

Plain-language summary

The purpose of this study is to show that the radiation exposure of the left distal radial artery approach is superior to the conventional right radial artery approach in terms of less radiation exposure.

Who can participate

Age range

20 Years

Sex

ALL

See this in plain English?

AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.

Inclusion criteria

. Patients aged 20 years or older
. Patients scheduled for coronary angiography and intervention

Exclusion criteria

. When the pulse of the Left distal radial artery cannot be palpated
. When the pulse of the right conventional radial artery cannot be palpated
. In case of arteriovenous fistula
. Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients
. In case femoral artery access must be performed (state of shock, etc.)
. In case of atrioventricular block
. When an ergonovine provocation test is required
. When the patient refuses to consent to the study

Questions worth asking your doctor

Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.

1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?

Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.

Questions for the trial coordinator

The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.

1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?

A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.

What they're measuring

Radiation exposure examination

Timeframe: Through procedure completion, up to 24 hours

Trial details

NCT IDNCT05702060

SponsorYonsei University

Sponsor typeOTHER

Study typeINTERVENTIONAL

Primary completion2025-03-31

View on ClinicalTrials.gov More Radiation Exposure trials