RecruitingNot Applicable

Comparison of MBR + Suture Tape, MBR, and Anatomic Reconstruction for CLAI in GJL Cases: A Prospective Cohort Study

China114 participantsStarted 2021-11-01

Plain-language summary

GJL is a risk factor for postoperative recurrent instability following an MBR for CLAI. BPR with suture tape augmentation and anatomic reconstruction may provide more strength and stability. However, BPR with suture tape augmentation may lead to rejection of the suture tape, while anatomic reconstruction may be associated with more trauma. In addition, the outcomes between the BPR with suture tape augmentation and anatomic reconstruction were unknown.

Who can participate

Age range18 Years – 60 Years

SexALL

See this in plain English?

AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.

Inclusion Criteria: * Clinical diagnosis of lateral ankle pain and instability Beighton score ≥4 Age with 18 to 60 years Exclusion Criteria: * Patients with an acute or subacute ankle injury (within 3 months) Injury of the deltoid ligament Alignment of lower extremity greater than 5 degrees Fractures of the lower extremity Stage III or IV osteoarthritis Patients who refused to participate in the study

What they're measuring

Karlsson-Peterson score

Timeframe: postoperative Karlsson score at 1 year

Karlsson-Peterson score

Timeframe: postoperative Karlsson score at 2 years

Trial details

NCT IDNCT05698446

SponsorPeking University Third Hospital

Sponsor typeOTHER

Study typeOBSERVATIONAL

Primary completion2025-06-01

Contact for this trial

Dong Jiang, MD

13811280948 bysyjiangdong@126.com

View on ClinicalTrials.gov More Ankle Sprains trials