One of the challenges of current implantology involves the preservation or reduction of existing bone resorption, mainly in the buccal bone plate, after tooth loss, which becomes of special importance in the anterior region of the maxilla (aesthetic region). The study evaluates the macroscopic shape of neck implant influence in the results of immediate implants, in a population comprised of individuals from the clinic of the Faculty of Dental Medicine of the University of Porto in need of replacement of a single tooth. It is intended to evaluate the morphometric (direct measures and plaster models measurements), imaging, and photographic characteristics of the V3 implant in comparison with the C1 implant of Mis® by an evaluation period of 6 months when placing an immediate implant.
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
A - Bone defect (clinical variables)
Timeframe: T0
B- Bacterial plaque index (O'Leary index)(clinical variables)
Timeframe: 6 months
C- Probing depth (clinical variables)
Timeframe: 6 months
D- Bleeding on probing (clinical variables)
Timeframe: 6 months
E- Gingival phenotype (clinical variables)
Timeframe: T-1
F- Implant insertion torque (Clinical variables)
Timeframe: T1
G- Implant stabilization quotient (ISQ) (clinical variables)
Timeframe: 6 months
Morphometric evaluation (clinical direct measurements)
Timeframe: 6 months
Morphometric evaluation (plaster models measurements)
Timeframe: 6 months
Imaging periapical X-ray evaluation (millimeter)
Timeframe: 6 months
Cone Beam Tomography (CBCT) evaluation (millimeter)
Timeframe: 6 months
PES/WES index - Photography results
Timeframe: 6 months