CompletedNot Applicable

Comparison of Three Different Puncture Techniques in EBUS-TBNA

China75 participantsStarted 2022-11-08

Plain-language summary

The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy and sensitivity of slow-pull capillary technique, traditional suction aspiration and non negative pressure puncture in the diagnosis of mediastinal and/or hilar lymph node enlargement by ultrasound bronchoscopic lymph node biopsy.

Who can participate

Age range18 Years – 80 Years

SexALL

See this in plain English?

AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.

Inclusion Criteria: * Age 18-80years * Chest computed tomography showing hilar or mediastinal lymph node enlargement * No contraindications for bronchoscopy * Signed informed consent provided by the patient * Disease needs to be diagnosed through the EBUS-TBNA Exclusion Criteria: * Severe coagulation dysfunction * Severe cardiopulmonary dysfunction * Acute asthma attack or massive haemoptysis * Poor general condition * Physical weakness without tolerance for anaesthesia or allergy to narcotic drug * Disease can be diagnosed by other less invasive methods (such as skin or peripheral superficial lymph node biopsy)

What they're measuring

Diagnostic accuracy of three different puncture methods according to pathological diagnosis

Timeframe: 6 months

Trial details

NCT IDNCT05628454

SponsorBeijing Friendship Hospital

Sponsor typeOTHER

Study typeINTERVENTIONAL

Primary completion2024-06-01

View on ClinicalTrials.gov More Lung Cancer trials