Comparison of Two Different Types of Platelet Concentrate to Augment Bone Around Immediate Dental… (NCT05595772) | Clinical Trial Compass
CompletedNot Applicable
Comparison of Two Different Types of Platelet Concentrate to Augment Bone Around Immediate Dental Implant
Egypt20 participantsStarted 2022-02-01
Plain-language summary
The goal of this clinial trial is to detect Which one of two different platelet concentrate bio-membrane (first or third generation) is better in terms of marginal bone level and bone density around immediate implants in esthetic zone using Cone beam computerized tomography The plasma rich in growth factor or concentrated growth factor?
20 patients with nonrestorable maxillary tooth in the esthetic zone, Subjects will be enrolled
The study will use simple randomization to allocate patients into 2 groups, each group will be included 10 patients: Group A: (concentrated growth factor group) ten patients indicated for immediate implant in the maxillary anterior region (class II socket), will be a candidate for immediate implant placement with CGF combined with xenogeneic bone graft Group B: (platelet-rich in growth factor group) Ten patients who indicated immediate implant in the maxillary anterior region (class I or class II socket), will be a candidate for immediate implant placement with PRGF combined with xenogeneic bone graft.
Who can participate
Age range
20 Years – 40 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion criteria
. Selected patients of both sexes are 20-40 years old.
. Patients are systemically healthy based on questionnaire dental modification of Cornell index.
. Gingival health according to the new classification system (2017)
. The recipient site of the implant is free from any pathological conditions.
. Class II extraction socket according to Chang's classification system
. Adequate interocclusal space to accommodate the available restorative components.
. Adequate native/apical bone to achieve primary implant stability.
Exclusion criteria
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.