Testing Different Methods of Intramuscular Injection (NCT05577832) | Clinical Trial Compass
CompletedNot Applicable
Testing Different Methods of Intramuscular Injection
Turkey (Türkiye)40 participantsStarted 2023-05-01
Plain-language summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare in different injection techniques. The main question\[s\] it aims to answer are:
* Is there a difference between the pain levels due to needle insertion in the injection made with the HST Technique, the ShotBlocker technique and the standard technique?
* Is there a difference between the hematoma levels of the injection made with the HST Technique, the ShotBlocker technique and the standard technique?
* Is there a difference between the comfort levels of the injection made with the HST Technique, ShotBlocker technique and standard technique?
* Is there a difference between the satisfaction levels of the patients with the injection made with the HST Technique, ShotBlocker technique and standard technique?
* Is there a difference between the injection fear levels of patients with HST Technique, ShotBlocker technique and standard technique?
Who can participate
Age range
18 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion criteria
. be over 18 years old
. Having intramuscular Dodex 1 ml amp injection treatment once a week for at least 3 consecutive weeks
. Not using anticoagulant drugs
. Absence of scarring, incision, lipodystrophy, infection at the injection site
. Absence of a history of drug allergy
. Absence of any disease that prevents perception of pain, fear and similar variables (vision, hearing, loss of sensation, cognitive disability, stroke, DM)
. Not using centrally or peripherally effective analgesics or sedatives
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.