CompletedNot Applicable

Urine Retention Rate Between Spinal and General Anesthesia for Anorectal Surgery

Taiwan1,400 participantsStarted 2017-01-01

Plain-language summary

Anorectal surgery includes pilonidal sinus, hemorrhoidectomy, anal fissure, and anal fistula operations. General and spinal anesthesia were common anesthetic methods in anorectal surgery. We designed this study to test the hypothesis that general anesthesia was superior than spinal anesthesia with respect to urine retention rate, pain score, recovery time, and side effects.

Who can participate

Age range20 Years

SexALL

See this in plain English?

AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.

Inclusion Criteria: * \>20 years old patients * ASA 1-2 patients * Patients who will undergo anorectal surgery with including hemorrhoidectomy, fistulectomy, fistulotomy, fissurectomy and anoplasty. Exclusion Criteria: * Having known hypersensitivity to amide type local anesthetics * Patients ASA \>=3 * Surgery methods: hemorrhoidopexy, Laser hemorrhoidoplasty * Fournier gangrene patients * Surgery due to previous complications

What they're measuring

Urine retention rate

Timeframe: 0-24 hours post operation.

Pain score

Timeframe: 0-24 hours post operation.

Trial details

NCT IDNCT05571202

SponsorTaichung Veterans General Hospital

Sponsor typeOTHER

Study typeOBSERVATIONAL

Primary completion2022-05-30

View on ClinicalTrials.gov More Anorectal Disorder trials