This research is being done to explore if modified, commercially available, joystick-operated, ride-on-cars can be used to promote bilateral arm function in children with hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy (CP). Specifically, the study evaluates the effects of a 6-week, home-based, child-friendly, innovative program that uses modified, commercially available, joystick-operated, powered ride-on-toys to promote spontaneous affected arm use and function in children with hemiplegic CP.
Age range
3 Years – 8 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
Change in Affected Arm Movement Control
Timeframe: Baseline, at 6-weeks (i.e., at the end of the control phase), at 12-weeks (i.e., at the end of intervention phase)
Changes in Use of Affected Arm in Functional Activities
Timeframe: Baseline, at 6-weeks (i.e., at the end of the control phase), at 12-weeks (i.e., at the end of intervention phase)
Changes in Habitual Arm Activity on the Affected Side
Timeframe: Baseline, at 6-weeks (i.e., at the end of the control phase), at 12-weeks (i.e., at the end of intervention phase)
Changes in Kinematic Measures of Movement Control on the Affected Arm
Timeframe: at 6-weeks (i.e., at the end of the control phase), at 12-weeks (i.e., at the end of intervention phase)
Treatment Satisfaction
Timeframe: At 6-weeks (i.e., at the end of the control phase), at 12 weeks (i.e. following completion of the intervention phase)
Perceived Satisfaction With Intervention
Timeframe: At 12 weeks (i.e. following completion of the intervention and control phases each lasting for 6 weeks)
Ease of Implementation of Training
Timeframe: At 12 weeks (i.e. following completion of the intervention and control phases each lasting for 6 weeks)
Changes in Treatment Fidelity Across Training Weeks
Timeframe: Early (week 1), Mid (week 3), and late (week 6) training sessions within the 6-week intervention phase
Changes in Toy Use (in Minutes/Week) Across Training Weeks
Timeframe: From start to end of 6-week intervention phase on a weekly basis
# of Training Sessions Completed Assessed Using Training Logs
Timeframe: From start to end of 6-week intervention phase on a weekly basis