NDMM Patients Candidates for ASCT Comparing Extended VRD Plus vs. Isa-VRD vs. Isa-V-Iberdomide (NCT05558319) | Clinical Trial Compass
RecruitingPhase 3
NDMM Patients Candidates for ASCT Comparing Extended VRD Plus vs. Isa-VRD vs. Isa-V-Iberdomide
Spain480 participantsStarted 2022-11-10
Plain-language summary
This is a Phase III open-label, 3-arm, parallel, randomized, controlled trial. The allocation ratio 1:1:1 and outcome assessment are blind to group allocation. Patients will be randomized from 3 arms. Patients will receive VRD extended + ASCT plus ERI or Isatuximab-VRD + ASCT or Isatuximab-VID + ASCT.
Who can participate
Age range
18 Years – 65 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion criteria
. Patient is, in the investigator's opinion, willing and able to comply with the protocol requirements.
. Patient must be able to understand the study procedures.
. Patient has given voluntary written informed consent before performance of any studyrelated procedure non part of normal medical care, with the understanding that consent may be withdrawn by the patient at any time without prejudice to their future medical care.
. Newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patient who requires start active treatment according to the 2014 IMWG criteria, namely clonal bone marrow plasma cells ≥10% or biopsy-proven bony or extramedullary plasmacytoma and any one or more of the following myeloma defining events: evidence of end organ damage that can be attributed to the underlying plasma cell proliferative disorder, specifically: Hypercalcaemia, Anaemia, Renal Insufficiency, or Bone lesions (one or more osteolytic lesions on skeletal radiography, CT, or PET-CT), and any one or more of the following biomarkers: clonal BMPC% ≥60%, i/u free light ratio ≥100 or \> 1 focal lesions on MRI or PET/CT) \[Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(12): e538-e548\].
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
What they're measuring
1
Efficacy in terms of patients who are MRD-negative by NGF
. Patient must have a measurable secretory disease defined as either serum monoclonal protein of ≥ 0,5 g/dl or urine monoclonal (light chain) protein ≥ 200 mg/24 h. For patients whose disease is only measurable by serum FLC, the involved FLC should be ≥ 10mg/dL (100 mg/L), with an abnormal serum FLC ratio.
. Patient must have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of ≤ 2.
. Patient must be ≤ 65 years of age.
. Patient must have adequate organ function, defined as follows:
Exclusion criteria
. Patient has a diagnosis of primary amyloidosis, monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS), smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM), plasma cell leukemia or active POEMS syndrome at the time of screening.
. Patient has had clinical evidence of central nervous system (CNS) or pulmonary leukostasis, disseminated intravascular coagulation, or CNS multiple myeloma.
. Prior history of malignancies, other than multiple myeloma (except for basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, carcinoma in situ of the cervix or the breast), unless the patient has been free of the disease for ≥ 5 years.
. Any serious medical condition that places the subject at an unacceptable risk if he or she participates in this study; subjects with conditions requiring chronic steroid or immunosuppressive treatment, such as rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis and/or lupus, that likely need additional steroid or immunosuppressive treatments in addition to the study treatment.
. Pregnant or breastfeeding females.
. Men and women of reproductive potential who are not using effective contraceptive methods (double barrier method, intrauterine device, oral contraception).
. Patient is simultaneously enrolled in other interventional clinical trial.
. Patient has used an investigational drug within 28 days or five half-lives, whichever is longer, preceding the first dose of study drug.