Open Retropubic Versus Laparoscopic Colposuspension (Burch Operation) Techniques for Female Stres… (NCT05452811) | Clinical Trial Compass
CompletedNot Applicable
Open Retropubic Versus Laparoscopic Colposuspension (Burch Operation) Techniques for Female Stress or Mixed Urinary Incontinence; A Ten-year Experience in a Tertiary Center
To evaluate postoperative course, efficacy, and complication rates of Open Burch Colposuspension and Laparoscopic Burch Colposuspension techniques in stress or mixed urinary incontinence at a single training and research hospital over the last 10 years in Istanbul, Turkey.
Who can participate
Age range30 Years
SexFEMALE
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion Criteria:
* patients having SUI or mixed urinary incontinence whom conservative therapy (Kegel's pelvic floor exercises, bladder training, electrical stimulation, or medication) failed
* SUI had been proven by urodynamic assessments.
* patients who had urethral hypermobility supported by a Q-type test with a cotton swab angle greater than 300
* patients having a residual urinary volume of less than 100 mL were included.
Exclusion Criteria:
* history of anti-incontinence surgery
* pelvic inflammatory diseases
* urinary retention
* SUI with intrinsic sphincter deficiency
* neurogenic bladder
* suspected malignancy
* urge incontinence
* chronic cystitis
* urinary tract infection
* prescription of anticoagulant or antipsychotic treatment
* coagulation disorders
* physically and medically unsuitable for colposuspension surgery
* pregnancy and loss to follow-up.
What they're measuring
1
Surgical success
Timeframe: 12 months after intervention
Trial details
NCT IDNCT05452811
SponsorKanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research Hospital