Bioinductive Patch for Full-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears
United States78 participantsStarted 2022-08-16
Plain-language summary
The purpose of this randomized-controlled study is to compare outcomes of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair augmented with a Bioinductive Implant (study group) to standard arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (control group). The primary outcome of this study is rotator cuff repair integrity (absence of full- or partial-thickness defect) demonstrated on ultrasound at 1-year postoperatively. The investigators hypothesize that the study group will have higher rates of repair integrity demonstrated on ultrasound at 1-year postoperatively.
Who can participate
Age range
18 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion Criteria:
* Indicated and scheduled for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.
* Full-thickness medium (1-3 cm), large (3-5 cm), and massive (\>5 cm) rotator cuff tears involving the supraspinatus and/or infraspinatus tendons demonstrated on magnetic resonance or ultrasound imaging.
* Chronic, degenerative rotator cuff tears.
* Ability to read and understand English.
* Age ≥18 years
* Patient failed ≥6 weeks of conservative treatment, which included structured, in-person physical therapy or documented home therapy
Exclusion Criteria:
* Patient scheduled for open or mini-open rotator cuff repair
* Prior surgery of affected shoulder (except diagnostic arthroscopy)
* Partial-thickness rotator cuff tears
* Small (\<1 cm) rotator cuff tears
* Rotator cuff tears involving the subscapularis tendon
* Acute and traumatic rotator cuff tears
* Active infection
* Cancer
* Autoimmune and rheumatologic disorders, including rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.