WithdrawnNot Applicable

Early Versus Delayed Urinary Catheter Removal After Minimally Invasive Lumbar Spine Surgery

Stopped: Benefits of no foley outweighed enrollment and use of foley.

United States0Started 2022-06-09

Plain-language summary

The study aims to compare between early versus delayed urinary catheter removal the impact on time to ambulation (in minutes) after minimally invasive lumbar spine surgery

Who can participate

Age range18 Years

SexALL

See this in plain English?

AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.

Inclusion Criteria: * Patients aged 18 years and older * Minimally invasive one- or two-level lumbar fusion procedures Exclusion Criteria: * Patients that cannot give consent * Patients with lower extremity amputation(s); * Non-minimally invasive surgeries * Patients with pre-existing bladder/kidney or urinary tract dysfunction * Patients with spinal cord injuries * Patients with known lower extremity weakness and impaired mobility.

What they're measuring

Ambulation

Timeframe: After the surgery, postoperative day 1

Trial details

NCT IDNCT05359926

SponsorUniversity of Kansas Medical Center

Sponsor typeOTHER

Study typeINTERVENTIONAL

Primary completion2023-08-01

View on ClinicalTrials.gov More Foley Catheterization trials