CompletedNot Applicable

Effect of Segmental Muscle Vibration on Upper Limb Function in Post Stroke Patients

Pakistan57 participantsStarted 2023-01-15

Plain-language summary

The aim of this study is to observe and to compare effects of segmental vibration on flexors versus extensor muscle groups on upper limb function in post-stroke patients. This study will be helpful in finding out that either low frequency segmental vibration on flexors muscle group is better in improving upper limb function or low frequency segmental vibration on extensor muscle group is more beneficent in improving upper limb function.

Who can participate

Age range

50 Years – 65 Years

Sex

ALL

See this in plain English?

AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.

Inclusion Criteria: * Both genders * Age: between 50-65 years. * Spasticity 1-3 on MAS * 3-6 months post stroke patients Exclusion Criteria: * Cardiovascular event (myocardial ischemia or infarction) occurring within 12 months, * Use of any antispastic drug * Pain from vibration * Inflammatory osteoarticular diseases

Questions worth asking your doctor

Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.

1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?

Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.

Questions for the trial coordinator

The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.

1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?

A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.

What they're measuring

Wolf Motor Functional Test

Timeframe: 10 to 15 minutes

Modified Ashworth Scale

Timeframe: 4 to 5 minutes

Fugl Meyer Assessment

Timeframe: 10 minutes

Manual Muscle Testing

Timeframe: 8 to 10 minutes

• Brunnstrom Stages of Stroke Recovery • Brunnstrom Stages of Stroke Recovery Brunnstrom Stages of Stroke Recovery

Timeframe: 5 to 10 minutes

Trial details

NCT IDNCT05356481

SponsorRiphah International University

Sponsor typeOTHER

Study typeINTERVENTIONAL

Primary completion2023-06-30

View on ClinicalTrials.gov More Stroke trials