Aphasia is an impairment in the ability to express and/or understand language, commonly observed after stroke to the language dominant (left) hemisphere. Despite natural tendency to spontaneous functional recovery in the first months post stroke and language improvement due to application of behavioral speech and language therapy (SLT), many aphasic patients do not achieve satisfactory level of verbal communication. The aim of the planned study is to explore the potential of the noninvasive repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) as a therapeutic tool for aphasia in addition to traditional behavioral therapy. In case of aphasia, studies on therapeutic effectiveness of rTMS aim to increase the activity of the language-dominant left cerebral hemisphere, which may be achieved in an indirect manner by inhibiting the activity of the opposite (right) hemisphere or in a direct manner by increasing the excitability of preserved language areas in the left hemisphere. In our study, we plan to administer the newest form of rTMS called Theta Burst Stimulation (TBS), which is safer than the conventional rTMS, even when used in the perilesional area. Computer-based neuronavigation system will be implemented to precisely localize stimulation targets, control administration of stimuli during rTMS sessions, and evaluate differences between participants regarding deviations from established stimulation points. 45 patients (all right-handed, polish native speakers, aged 18-75 years, diagnosed with non-fluent aphasia) will be enrolled in a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial. Subjects will be randomly assigned to one of the three groups: 1) a group with excitatory intermittent TBS of the left hemisphere (iTBS group), 2) a group with inhibitory continuous TBS of the right hemisphere (cTBS group), 3) a group with sham TBS (sTBS group as a control group). Specific forms of stimulation will be carried out for three consecutive weeks (Monday to Friday; a total of 15 stimulation sessions). Immediately after each session of the stimulation, patients will undergo individual SLT. Assessment of language functioning will be carried out three times: before and after the therapy period, and 3 months after its completion. Results of the study will broaden knowledge about hemispherical mechanisms of language and speech recovery after stroke and provide insight into possibilities of their modulation for the purpose of post-stroke rehabilitation.
Age range
18 Years – 75 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
Change from pre-treatment assessment in the performance on a picture naming task
Timeframe: Pre-treatment assessment (within 2 days before starting the intervention), post-treatment assessment (within 2 days of completing the 15 days intervention)
Change from pre-treatment in the performance on the picture naming task at 3 months post-therapy (follow up assessment)
Timeframe: Pre-treatment and 3 months follow-up (post-treatment) assessment
Change from post-treatment in the performance on the picture naming task at 3 months post-therapy
Timeframe: Post-treatment and 3 months follow-up assessment
Change from pre-treatment assessment in the performance on a scene description task of three visually presented scenes
Timeframe: Pre-treatment assessment, post-treatment assessment (within 2 days of completing the 15 days intervention)
Change from pre-treatment in the scene description task at 3 months post-therapy
Timeframe: Pre-treatment and 3 months follow-up
Change from post-treatment in the scene description task at 3 months post-therapy
Timeframe: Post-treatment and 3 months follow-up
Change from pre-treatment on the semantic fluency task
Timeframe: Pre-treatment and post-treatment (within 2 days of completing the 15 days intervention)
Change from pre-treatment on the semantic fluency task at 3 months post-therapy
Timeframe: Pre-treatment and 3 months follow-up
Change from post-treatment on the semantic fluency task at 3 months post-therapy
Timeframe: Post-treatment and 3 months follow-up