CompletedNot Applicable

Accuracy of Trephination-based Versus Drilling-based Guided Dental Implant Placement

Egypt22 participantsStarted 2022-04-01

Plain-language summary

This study will be initiated to compare the accuracy of implant placement using the guided trephination drilling protocol and the guided conventional drilling protocol.

Who can participate

Age range20 Years – 50 Years

SexALL

See this in plain English?

AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.

Inclusion criteria

✓. Single missing maxillary premolar or molar tooth.
✓. Both genders aged from 20-50 years.
✓. Patients should be systematically free from any disease as according to Cornell Medical Index-Health Questionnaire. (Pendleton et al,.2004)
✓. Mesio-distal space ≥ 7 mm.
✓. Bone width in bucco-lingual direction ≥ 6 mm.
✓. Uniform alveolar ridge with no undercuts.
✓. Present mesial and distal sound neighboring teeth.
✓. At least 4 natural remaining teeth on the same arch.

What they're measuring

Horizontal deviation at apex of the implant.

Timeframe: immediately after the intervention

•Horizontal deviation at implant shoulder.

Timeframe: immediately after the intervention

Angular deviation.

Timeframe: immediately after the intervention

Trial details

NCT IDNCT05295082

SponsorMohammed Ramadan

Sponsor typeOTHER

Study typeINTERVENTIONAL

Primary completion2023-06-20

View on ClinicalTrials.gov More Single Tooth Lost trials