In recent years, there was a great interest in employing the surgical guide in dentistry due to the development occurred in the 3D printing which became available widely. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is necessary and crucial in planning for endodontic surgery, but the procedure still depends on how the surgeon reflect the 3D images on the anatomical structures accurately, which may leave room for error. This study is to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes using guided endodontic microsurgery versus conventional endodontic microsurgery in critical anatomical structures.
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Clinical Success at two weeks
Timeframe: Periodontal tissue healing will be evaluated clinically "2 weeks"
Clinical Success at one year
Timeframe: Clinical signs or symptoms will be evaluated "1 year"
Radiographic Success at 6 months
Timeframe: Periapical tissues healing will be evaluated radiographically at 6 months after surgery
Radiographic Success at 12 months
Timeframe: Periapical tissues healing will be evaluated radiographically at 12 months after surgery